Article 39797 of rec.music.synth: Newsgroups: rec.music.synth Path: news.service.uci.edu!usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!metlay From: metlay@netcom.com (metlay) Subject: Re: Super Jupiter/JX10 etc. Message-ID: <7pznv#=.metlay@netcom.com> Date: Tue, 15 Sep 92 14:50:30 GMT Organization: Atomic City Summary: Hard sync References: <1992Sep14.185212.6622@morrow.stanford.edu> Distribution: usa Lines: 30 In article <1992Sep14.185212.6622@morrow.stanford.edu> AS.TLK@forsythe.stanford.edu (Timmer) writes: >metlay@netcom.com (metlay) writes: >> >>Any other questions? > >Now that you mention it. I just picked up a used JX-8P. Being one >of those digital wanker types, I have to confess I don't know what >hard-syncing one oscillator to the other does. If I were to guess, >the sound is something like ring mod, but what exactly is going on? When two oscillators are hard-synched to one another, one is forced to reset to the beginning of its waveform every time the other one does. If you then vary the pitch of the controlling waveform a little, you introduce little "jags" into the waveform you perceive coming from the other oscillator-- an extra hiccup at the beginning of a sawtooth wave, for instance, or a triangle wave that doesn't go all the way down before starting back up again. This is perceived by the ear as a dynamic addition of high-frequency information-- extra harmonics. It's a very powerful technique. For an example of how it can be overused to the point of nausea, check out my first Xpander solo in "Netstrophonie," track 2 of Team Metlay's _Bandwidth_ CD. As you'll-- what? What do you MEAN, "I haven't released it yet"?! Of all the-- Oh. I haven't, have I? Um. Erm. I'll go away now. Never mind. Sorry. |-P -- metlay | I'm currently taking suggestions for the next | utterly brilliant quote to be put here. Please | feel free to nominate anyone you consider to be metlay@netcom.netcom.com | a worthwhile candidate (with attribution). Thanks.